<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.156 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Mon, 20 May 2013 08:46:00 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Journal</title><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.156 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>Sadly, The Office is nearing the end. I will miss it greatly.</title><category>NBC</category><category>Office</category><category>Television</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 01:01:04 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2013/5/14/sadly-the-office-is-nearing-the-end-i-will-miss-it-greatly.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:33716432</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, May 16, 2013, The last episode of The Office will air.&nbsp; It will be a 75 minute show and, by all accounts, will wrap up the series nicely.</p>
<p>I have a passion for this show that boarders on the obsessive.&nbsp; I watch it continually.&nbsp; Every night, in fact.&nbsp; I have seen each episode in seasons 1-7 at least a dozen times.&nbsp; I finish watching them (in order, of course) and promptly start back at episode 1, season 1.&nbsp; And then I watch straight through until season 8, episode 24.&nbsp; Rinse.&nbsp; Repeat.</p>
<p>So why this obsession with The Office?&nbsp; Why do I love this series so much that most people are ambivalent to and some down right hate it?&nbsp; I have contemplated this at length and I think it is the depth of the characters that really appeals to me and how each time I watch it, I learn something new about the characters and their relationship to one another.</p>
<p>I remember when I first watched the series it was about mid season in season two.&nbsp; The was so much I missed the first time through that I can scarcely believe it.&nbsp; For example, I remember when Jim caught Dwight and Angela going at it in the office.&nbsp; I was as shocked as he was by this!&nbsp; I missed all the signs and innuendo about them.&nbsp; Upon review I was shocked that I missed it all.</p>
<p>Now as I rewatch each episode, I discover similar, if less pronounced, pieces of the puzzle as it were.</p>
<p>One thing that always astounds me is how Michael Scott (Steve Carrell) is such a buffoon 90% of the time, but when it counts, he is a genius.&nbsp; After forming the Michael Scott Paper Company and he is negotiating with David Wallace he points out that his company doesn't need to survive that long, but only need to survive to the next Dunder Mifflin board meeting at which point David Wallace will be out of a job for letting their most successful branch fail.&nbsp; Or when he throws Jan under the bus at the deposition when he realizes that she had already planned to do the same to him by bringing his diary to present as evidence in the lawsuit against Dunder Mifflin.</p>
<p>It is the writting and the actors that bring these character to life.&nbsp; They make it more than a simple half-hour sitcom on Thursday nights.&nbsp; They bring life and heart to the characters.&nbsp; The bring a depth that can be easily overlooked or missed by the casual viewer.</p>
<p>Michael Scott always refered to the people in The Office as a family.&nbsp; Over the years, despite their differences, the story grew to show how right he was: they did form a family.&nbsp; A crazy, mixed up, mostly psychotic family, but a family none the less.</p>
<p>I will miss watching their antics.&nbsp; It was always a bright spots of my week.</p>
<p>But I always have them on DVD.&nbsp; And Netflix.&nbsp; And Tuesday night on TBS, And on Hulu, and....</p>
<p>Michael Scarn lives!!!!</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-33716432.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>TaxAct vs TurboTax...My humble opinion</title><category>software</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2013/4/12/taxact-vs-turbotaxmy-humble-opinion.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:33322368</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Like most people, I loathe doing taxes.&nbsp; Getting the forms, collecting all the right paperwork, calling the different places for information that should have been given but wasn&rsquo;t&hellip;.always a headache.&nbsp; But even more than doing the actual taxes is the fear of the dreaded audit.&nbsp; The tax code in the U.S. is staggering in scope.&nbsp;&nbsp; Even being as diligent as I can possibly can, there is always a fear that something is going to be forgotten or missed and thus triggering the infamous IRS audit.</p>
<p>To help me minimize the risk, I have been using <a href="http://turbotax.intuit.com/">TurboTax Online</a> since 2007.&nbsp; And while I love the software for its ease of use and support, one thing I didn&rsquo;t like was the price.&nbsp; For me it runs about $100 per year to do both state and federal returns.&nbsp; And while I hated paying it, I would swallow it because it was just so quick and easy to use.</p>
<p>So this year I decided to try another programs to see if it was as good at a lower cost.&nbsp; After reading a few reviews, I decided to try <a href="http://www.taxact.com/">TaxAct</a>.&nbsp; It was pretty highly rated, and at 1/3 the cost of TurboTax Online, why not give it a shot?</p>
<p>I downloaded the stand alone TaxAct Deluxe with my state for about $30.&nbsp; My initial impression was positive, but I had forgotten all of the things TurboTax automated from previous years.&nbsp; &nbsp;Still it wasn&rsquo;t too bad.</p>
<p>Then I came to the part where it asks for interest that was received.&nbsp; I had a few bank accounts that I did not receive a 1099-INT because the total interest was less than $10.&nbsp; Unlike TurboTax, which asks for the name of the institution and a few other items, TaxAct wanted me to fill out a 1099-INT.&nbsp; And that&rsquo;s fine too.&nbsp; But the issue was I did not have a payee EID number for the banks.&nbsp; (On a separate, but related, note, when I asked the banks for this information one of them said &ldquo;Oh, we don&rsquo;t give that information out.&rdquo;&nbsp; When I told them that I needed it to fill out a 1099-INT form for the IRS she told me that she couldn&rsquo;t give that information out to &ldquo;just anyone&rdquo; and suggested I not even tell the IRS about it.&nbsp; Good Grief!)</p>
<p>So this led me down the first of many wild goose chases with TaxAct that end up with me calling the IRS for advice/direction on three separate issues.&nbsp; I have never needed to do that with TurboTax.</p>
<p>Another point of issue was on the charitable donation portion of Schedule A.&nbsp; TurboTax prompts you to input the specific information (who, what, where, how much) for all the charities and keeps a record of it for your future use. &nbsp;&nbsp;TaxAct simply asks for how much.&nbsp; And while that might be fine for most purposes, if I need to go back and look at the details from a prior year, TurboTax makes this much easier through better record keeping.</p>
<p>And the final think that set me on edge was on the Illinois State form.&nbsp; Illinois has a &ldquo;Use Tax&rdquo; for anything that you buy on the internet that doesn&rsquo;t charge state sales tax (we&rsquo;re looking at you, Amazon&hellip;)&nbsp; TurboTax always used to calculate this for me, but TaxAct want me to get the form and calculate it myself.&nbsp; This made me very nervous, especially considering I did not have the UT form they mentioned nor did I know where to get it.&nbsp; Later I found out that it was simply the total amount purchase times the state sales take rate of 6.25%.&nbsp; Duh!</p>
<p>By the time I was finished, I was very nervous about the tax information I was about to submit.&nbsp; So I decided that, since TurboTax doesn&rsquo;t charge until I file, I would run it all through TurboTax and see what the difference was.&nbsp;</p>
<p>It took me about 35 minutes to do both state and federal taxes using TurboTax.&nbsp; I whipped through it like a hot knife through butter.&nbsp; And I got that warm, fuzzy feeling that everything was going to be okay.&nbsp; Well, as warm and fuzzy a feeling as you can get while doing taxes.&nbsp; I finally reached the end and the verdict was in&hellip;</p>
<p>It turns of that my refund amounts for both state and federal taxes were identical for both pieces of software.&nbsp; I felt relieved that TaxAct did not lead me astray after all.&nbsp; The main differences were:</p>
<ul>
<li>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; TurboTax was easier and more friendly to use</li>
<li>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; TurboTax was faster, but that might have been because it had historic data to go by</li>
<li>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; TaxAct was much cheaper.&nbsp; $30 vs $90 for TurboTax Deluxe with State.</li>
</ul>
<p>So which will I use next year?&nbsp; I don&rsquo;t know.&nbsp; I really like the price of TaxAct, but I miss the reassurance I always felt with TurboTax.&nbsp; Is that extra money worth that feeling and the slicker interface?</p>
<p>I guess I have a year to decide.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-33322368.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Evil Dead 2013...what fun!</title><category>Movies</category><category>Movies</category><category>horror</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:07:13 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2013/4/11/evil-dead-2013what-fun.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:33319363</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I love horror movies.&nbsp; I can be a bit selective as I don't enjoy "torture" movies like Saw and Hostel.&nbsp; But in general, the old time monster/killer/demon/undead movies are right up my alley.&nbsp; So it was with great excitement that, with the blessing of Sam Rami, Evil Dead was being remade.&nbsp; But with that excitement came a bit of trepidation: would it be as good as the original?</p>
<p>A word however to those that have not watched the original Evil Dead or its spawn, Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness.&nbsp; They are an acquired taste.&nbsp; Most people would probably not enjoy them.&nbsp; They are over the top.&nbsp; And that it is their actual charm. &nbsp;They are silly and preposterous and just barely take themselves seriously enough that most viewers don&rsquo;t get the joke.</p>
<p>So when I learned it was coming out, I knew I had to go see it with one of my two cohorts in horror movie crime, my oldest daughter.&nbsp; (My youngest daughter is just a little too young to see this one.&nbsp; Even I have my limits.)&nbsp;<span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://slashreboot.squarespace.com/storage/evil-dead-poster.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1365712924762" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>I have to say upfront that this was not my proudest parenting moment (but it may have been one of the funnest.)&nbsp; My oldest daughter is 14 and we&rsquo;ve been watching horror movies together for a few years now.&nbsp; I usually do quite a bit of research on horror movies before I let her see them, and this one was no exception.&nbsp; Still, I don&rsquo;t expect many fathers would take a 14 year old girl to see the Evil Dead, nor do I condone, endorse or approve of this movie for anybody but myself and my daughter.&nbsp; Your mileage may vary.</p>
<p>In preparation for the new version, I watched the original with her.&nbsp; She liked it and so the wheels were set in motion to see the new one.</p>
<p>It was awesome.&nbsp; It was everything I had hoped it would be and then some.&nbsp; At one point we were both laughing out loud hysterically.&nbsp; It was awkward because nobody else in the theater seemed to get the jokes.&nbsp; But when the movie was over, I felt that director Fede Alvarez did a fine job capturing the spirit and feel of the original and yet bringing it into the 21<sup>st</sup> century.</p>
<p><strong>****SPOILER ALERT*****</strong></p>
<p>The only disappointment was that Bruce Campbell did not make a cameo in this movie.</p>
<p><strong>****END SPOILER ALERT*****</strong></p>
<p>If you have ever wistfully wondered if you can get enough &ldquo;chainsaw in the mouth&rdquo; action, then this is the movie for you.&nbsp; My daughter and I left the theater feeling that we got our money&rsquo;s worth from Evil Dead.&nbsp; We&rsquo;re looking forward to the sequel and I am looking forward to a director&rsquo;s cut DVD.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-33319363.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Frustation of the trailing space...</title><category>DOS</category><category>Tech</category><category>Windows Server</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2013/4/2/the-frustation-of-the-trailing-space.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:33183658</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I spent a good chunk of time today trying to delete a folder from a Windows 2008 R2 server that I could not get to go away.&nbsp; What I finally discovered was that the folder name had a trailing space at the end of the name.&nbsp; What I thought was the name "New" was actually "New " (please note the space) and the system truncated that space when it went to delete the folder, thus trying to delete "New" which did not exist.</p>
<p>So in order to delete this puppy, I needed to find the the 8.3 file name.&nbsp; Using the command prompt, I navigated to the directory that contained this foul beast and ran a dir /x, which returned the result of "New~1" as the file name.&nbsp; Then it was simply a matter of clearing out the files "New~1" contained (which it turns out was another folder with a trailing space) and then running a simple rmdir "New~1" and I was back in business.</p>
<p>Way too much time for something so simple.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-33183658.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>MDM Solution: Air-Watch and mobilEcho implementation</title><category>Android</category><category>Apple</category><category>MDM</category><category>MobilEcho</category><category>Tech</category><category>air-watch</category><category>ios</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:03:53 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2013/3/22/mdm-solution-air-watch-and-mobilecho-implementation.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:33096539</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few months I have been working on a system to unify the management of our mobile devices and allow a BYOD policy at the same time.  Currently we do not allow Androids in our business because of the <a href="http://www.f-secure.com/static/doc/labs_global/Research/Mobile%20Threat%20Report%20Q4%202012.pdf">security risk associated with them</a>.  But there is a lot of drive from our employees to go to them, as well as some good business reasons to do so as well.  These reasons include the wide selection of carriers and the relative low cost of both the phones and the tablets.  This makes the Android a very attractive platform.  The security and fragmentation of the platform, however, have made it kind of hard to make a jump to the Android OS company-wide.</p><p>And being a small IT department of two people managing 300+ users, I didn't want to manage another device or server to accomplish these goals.</p><p>So with that in mind, I began looking for a MDM solution that would meet the following criteria:</p><p>The solution should</p><p>1)      Manage multiple platforms including iOS, Android, Windows Mobile, and even Blackberry.</p><p>2)      Be easy to use.  I don't want to go through six weeks of training just to figure out how to use it.</p><p>3)      Allow apps to be rolled out en masse.</p><p>4)      Allow enforcement of security policies.</p><p>5)      Allow selective wipe of company data from personal phones.</p><p>6)      Roll out company settings for mail, VPN, WiFi, etc.</p><p>I chose four different solutions to evaluate.  (Well, technically five, but since the Apple Configurator won&rsquo;t magange Androids, Blackberries and Windows phones, it was DOA.) </p><p>The first was MobileIron.  I was enthralled by MobileIron, but that soon waned when I discovered that MobileIron was on "on-premises" box that would need to be configured and maintained.  But I was still tempted.  MobileIron definitely has the security nailed down.  I liked how it could handle rouge apps and the management seemed very smooth and tuned.</p><p>Next I looked at <a href="http://www.meraki.com/">Meraki</a>. Meraki was just <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/cisco-buys-meraki-for-1-2-billion-5-reasons-the-deal-makes-sense-7000007603/">bought by Cisco</a> and honestly that's the reason I took a look at them.  And oddly, it was also the thing that drove me away from them.  Right now, the price is free.  Yup, free.  However, while they state they have no intentions of changing that, I have seen things like this change dramatically shortly after the little fish is eaten by the big fish. This would force me to either reevaluate the MDM solution and possibly re-implement another MDM solution at some point in the future.  Worse yet, they could discontinue it all together and leave me in the lurch.  It is a fine solution, and spreads far beyond just mobile devices to include PCs and Macs, but I need to minimize disruptions to the employees and this uncertainty didn't leave me with a warm fuzzy feeling.</p><p>The next two on my list were Air-watch and MaaS360, both at the recommendation of my CDW rep.  After asking some folks I know at other companies and at the recommendation of some folks over at the IT Admin Forum at LinkedIn, I decided to try Air-watch first.</p><p>After they went through a short tutorial and got the initial test server configured, there were some minor issues but nothing huge.  It did seem, at the beginning, that the profiles that Air-watch pushed out were hit or miss in regards to their implementation and their effectiveness.  But after a while the basics were covered and everything was working fine.  I was ready to broaden the test and implement an EIS (Enterprise Integration server) server internally and start rolling it out to some test users.  Now I know, dear reader, that this flies in the face of my requirement of not having another server to manage, but please understand that this is merely a piece of software that runs on an existing server and has an agent that synchs Active directory information with the off-site Air-watch server.  It also allows the Air-watch<span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 650px;" src="http://www.slashreboot.com/storage/SCL.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364064187354" alt="" /></span></span> Secure Content Locker to map internal WebDAV shares, network shares, and Sharepoint Shares.  This was going to be, for my company, the true selling point and power of Air-Watch.</p><p>Or so I thought.  Initially everything worked fine.  But then I started adding more shares and the problems began.  Without getting into to gory of details, the shares that I had way exceed the normal capacity of Air-watch.  And truthfully, even I was surprised by the quantity of documents we had and were trying to share.  It turns out that in our main folder structure there were over 2,500,000 documents.  It seems that currently (and I am speculating here because it is where AW stopped indexing the documents) that AW is limited to about 184,000 files.  Which is probably fine for 99% of the users, but we needed either a) something that would get all of them,  b) change the way the data is retained and structured or c) limit what we put in the SCL.</p><p>Before I continue, however, I want to take a moment to mention the customer support at Air-watch.  From the sales rep to the tech support, they are one of the most dedicated group of folks I have ever seen in the industry.  I could be cynical and say it was just because I was testing the software that they were so dedicated, but honestly the numbers just don't support such cynicism.  We simply don't have a large enough user base for that to be true.  So I feel they were doing it out of the commitment to the product and the customer.  A number of times I had called it quits on AW because I didn't think it was going to be a good fit, but they worked with me and held my hand until I realized that it was a good fit and had a place in my organization.  And more than that, they were going to help me make this MDM solution a success come hell or high-water.  You don't find that often enough in IT companies.</p><p>Because of their dedication to product and customer, I never even made it to testing MaaS360.</p><p>So with the MDM solution secure, except for the ability to get network documents on the mobile devices, I decided to see if there as a piece of software dedicated to just that: putting data in network shares on mobile devices.</p><p>So after some investigation, I found <a href="http://www.grouplogic.com/enterprise-file-sharing/ipad-file-system/">MobileEcho</a> by GroupLogic.  Like AW, it also places a a few small files on the server (which I placed on the same server with the AW EIS software) and runs two services: one to index the files in  the locations you want to share on the mobile device and the other to manage some extended permissions, handle wiping data, sending out enrolment notices, etc.<span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 500px;" src="http://www.slashreboot.com/storage/me1.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364064147075" alt="" /></span></span>  All the management for the software, other than the indexing portion, is done through a simple but effective web interface.</p><p>Out of all the installations I have done and software I have implemented, I would have to say that this one of the simplest and easy to configure software packages I have ever seen.  I had it up and running in about ten minutes.  And the speed is incredible.  Navigating the network shares on the mobile device is literally faster than doing it on the computer.  I don't make this statement lightly: this software is amazing.  The reaction from my test users were as follows:</p><p>"Wow!"</p><p>"Buy it."</p><p>"Holy S*%$"</p><p>"How can I get this on my PC?"</p><p>The only caveat to it, and this is really a matter of choice, is that we are not going to open it up on the firewall.  So my end users will need to access it via VPN.  That means there is an additional step or two they will need to do to get access to their data which they would not have needed to do using the AW SCL.  But in the end, that's okay because the tradeoff is speed is well worth those couple of extra steps.</p><p>I am now working on getting a firm count on mobile devices and users and working out pricing.  I think these two products are going to benefit my company enormously and increase our competitive edge in our market.</p><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-33096539.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>God has an interesting sense of humor sometimes...</title><category>Christ</category><category>God</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2013/3/4/god-has-an-interesting-sense-of-humor-sometimes.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:32919287</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I recently encountered a neighbor at a local supermarket. &nbsp;She asked me if I had called the police on the neighbors next door. &nbsp;I stated I hadn't and asked her why she was asking. &nbsp;She stated the she had noticed a lot of odd activity next door with a lot of people coming and going at all hours of the day and night. &nbsp;She spoke to the police about this activity. &nbsp;She then informed me that (without going into too much detail) they were apparently recovering addicts.</p>
<p>Being a father of small children, I got very concerned. &nbsp;I immediately went into hyper-protective mode. &nbsp;I was going to get a CCTV system and put it up and monitor the house. &nbsp;I was going to take some serious steps here. &nbsp;I was going to call the landlord and ask her what she thought she was doing...renting to THOSE kind of people. &nbsp;How dare she put my family at risk!</p>
<p>The whole while, a little voice kept chiding me not to judge even as I was ranting about the situation in front of my children. &nbsp;I struggled with it because I was torn between wanting to protect my family and wanting to follow the words of Christ and withhold judgement. &nbsp;Thankfully, between the little voice and the price tag of the CCTV systems I looked at, I decided to hold off until I learned a little more. &nbsp;After all, all I had against them was the word of a neighbor. &nbsp;And honestly, I every respect they had thus far been good neighbors. They were quite, they put up holiday decorations. &nbsp;They even shoveled my sidewalk one day.</p>
<p>The very next day guess who shows up in our church...the same neighbors.</p>
<p>My wife and I couldn't believe it. What a poor example I was in front of our kids...trash talking the neighbors and the landlord. &nbsp;All the while we had folks right next door looking for a church. &nbsp;And instead of meeting them, getting to know them, &nbsp;and asking them if they were interested in coming to church, we assumed the worst and hid ourselves away.</p>
<p>I cannot believe that this was a chance occurrence.</p>
<p>God has a interesting sense of humor...</p>
<p>Well played, God, well played....lesson learned.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-32919287.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The best thing since CTRL+C and CTRL+V</title><category>Evernote</category><category>Screen Shot</category><category>Shortcuts</category><category>Windows 7</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 03:59:09 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2013/1/4/the-best-thing-since-ctrlc-and-ctrlv.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:32412942</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I learned about cut and paste way back when in Windows 3.1.&nbsp; Its use was a lot less prevalent back then as apps seemed to be more compartmentalized back then.&nbsp; But the cut and paste functionality was huge in it's power.&nbsp; The ability to take data from one piece of software and move it en masse to another with two key strokes was a huge development and I feel it was one of the primary factors in the success of the personal PC.</p>
<p>That's why I still find it so amazing how many people still don't use this powerful and time saving feature more.&nbsp; (Worst still is not using the alt-tab feature to scroll through windows versus closing them, which I still see people to all the time.&nbsp; I have many end users that still won't use this feature despite my pointing it out and every opportunity.)</p>
<p>I didn't really think anything could beat the cut and paste feature, but there might be a contender...The Snipping Tool.&nbsp; I recently learned about the snipping tool from a colleague.&nbsp; It was in Windows Vista, Windows 7 and now in Windows 8.&nbsp; (I am using it currently in Windows 7.&nbsp; I never really used Windows Vista enough to find this feature for a number of reasons that are noted ad nauseum on the internet.)</p>
<p>Anyway, I have longe used the alt+prnt-scrn key and the ctrl+V key to copy and paste screen shots into emails, word documents, etc.&nbsp; The downside to this was always that if I wanted to grab a particular part of a screen or window, I need to get the screen shot a<span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://slashreboot.squarespace.com/storage/snipping.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1357360463685" alt="" /></span></span>nd then put it into some type of editing program like MS Paint and the clip the part I needed.&nbsp; I have tried various screen shot programs, but none really seemed to do the job.</p>
<p>Thankfully those days are gone.&nbsp; The Snipping tool allows you to clip just part of the screen you want and then paste it into whatever program you like (like word or Outlook email.)&nbsp; The one downside however is that it doesn't have a nifty keyboard shortcut like cut and past or alt+tab.&nbsp; But that is easily fixed.</p>
<p>1. Click "Start" and in the search box, type "Snipping Tool" in the search box.<span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.slashreboot.com/storage/snip_search.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1357361086124" alt="" width="345" height="583" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>2. On the Snipping Tool in the search results, right-click to bring up the context menu and select "Properties."</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.slashreboot.com/storage/snip_context.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1357361139041" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>3.&nbsp; In the Properties, in the Shortcut field, select a key to associate with the Snipping Tool.&nbsp; I chose Z</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.slashreboot.com/storage/snip_prop.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1357361257954" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>because I can do it easily with the left hand and it is close to the CTRL+C and CTRL+V.&nbsp; Once that is done you can easily bring up the snipping tool quickly and easily and it can make putting screen shots in documents and emails (and Evernote) very easy to do.</p>
<p>Hope you find this as useful and as big of a time saver as I did.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-32412942.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Denny's Diner</title><category>Dining</category><category>Resturants</category><category>Travel</category><category>Wisconsin Dells</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:52:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2013/1/2/dennys-diner.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:32317092</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>If you have ever watched <a href="http://www.foodnetwork.com/diners-drive-ins-and-dives/index.html">"Diners. Drive-Ins and Dives"</a> on the Food Network, then you will appreciate Denny's Diner in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin.&nbsp; There are plenty of good restaurants in the Dells, to be sure, and plenty of familiar chains as well. I've been going to the Dells for years and the one place I somehow missed was Denny's Diner.&nbsp; Perhaps it is the location (on the corner of of Rt. 12 and Rt. 23) that made me miss it, but boy have I been missing out.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Denny's Diner (not to be confused with the national "Denny's" chain) is a hidden gem of a restaurant.&nbsp; The decor is similar to a 50's diner, but with a hodge-podge of oddities thrown in.&nbsp; From Beatles poster on the walls, to a Tasmanian devil hanging from the ceiling to a train going by overhead, it is hard to describe the wild menagerie of collectables found in the restaurant.</p>
<p>But that is just the beginning of the enjoyment at Denny's Diner.&nbsp; We went for breakfast.&nbsp; I had the Spanish omele (which could feed a small army), my wife had the Eggs Benedict, my oldest daughter the standard two eggs and bacon, and my youngest daughter the biscuits and gravy.&nbsp; All were very good and well worth a return trip on their own.&nbsp; But the hash browns, for me, were the star of the show.&nbsp; I would go back just for those.&nbsp; But my wife and youngest daughter liked the home-made cinnamon rolls the best.</p>
<p>Of course the toast on home-made bread was quite a treat.&nbsp; Yes, that's right...home-made bread.</p>
<p>We wound up at Denny's Diner by chance this time.&nbsp; On our next trip to the Dells, you can rest assured that our next visit to Denny's will be high on the itinerary of things to do while we are there.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.urbanspoon.com/r/322/1319392/restaurant/Wisconsin/Wisconsin-Dells/Dennys-Diner-Lake-Delton"><img style="border: none; padding: 0px; width: 200px; height: 146px;" src="http://www.urbanspoon.com/b/link/1319392/biglink.gif" alt="Denny's Diner on Urbanspoon" /></a></span></span></p><p><br/><br/><br/><br/></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-32317092.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Google Toolbar in IE 9 not showing up.</title><category>Google</category><category>Google Toolbar</category><category>IE8</category><category>IE9</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:51:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2012/12/13/google-toolbar-in-ie-9-not-showing-up.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:32028408</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I finally am being forced to upgrade IE 8 on my work PC to IE 9.&nbsp; I'm not a huge fan of IE anyway, but I don't hate it either.&nbsp; It has its pros and cons.&nbsp; But I definitely prefer the UI on IE8 to that of IE9.&nbsp; Specifically I do not like the alert bar at the bottom nor the way downloads are handled in IE9.&nbsp; But honestly at the end of the day that is just opinion and preference and has no real bearing on how "good" it is as an internet browser.</p>
<p>I know many people complain about security in IE and the slowness, but sometimes, since it is the de facto standard of browsers, it has to be used to get the job done.&nbsp; I use five different browsers personally. In descending order of use they are Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer, Chrome, and Atomic Web browser (on the iPad.)</p>
<p>So I made the switch and sure enough the one feature I insist on having in IE, Google Toolbar, won't install correctly.&nbsp; Well, to be more precise, it installs just fine.&nbsp; I just cannot see it.&nbsp; I do the usual uninstall, reboot, reinstall to no avail.&nbsp; I made sure the add-on was enabled, that I had the right version for my OS, etc.&nbsp; Everything checked out, but still no toolbar.&nbsp; And even more problematic, in the View&gt;&gt;Toolbars the Google Toolbar wasn't even showing up.</p>
<p>Then I started going through me settings and found that one of the settings on the Internet Options&gt;&gt;advanced&gt;&gt;browsing was disabled and causing me all my problems.&nbsp; It was the one named "Allow third party Browser Extensions" and it was unchecked.&nbsp; I checked it to enable add-ons, restarted the browser and, voil&agrave;, I had my toolbar once again.</p>
<p>Still not entirely happy about using IE9, but I am better now that I have my toolbar back.</p><p><br/><br/><br/></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-32028408.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Getting tired of the news being dominated by the Middle East...</title><category>Middle East</category><category>NPR</category><dc:creator>Ed Hands</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:41:35 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/2012/11/30/getting-tired-of-the-news-being-dominated-by-the-middle-east.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601730:6983287:31532241</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I listen to NPR quite a bit and every hour they have the news headlines.&nbsp; Over the past five years both the news and the coverage have increasingly and disproportionately been dedicated to events, topics, and stories about the Middle East.</p>
<p>I understand there is a lot going on over there, and has been for a while.&nbsp; And I am sensitive to the volatility of the region and its importance to the United States and the world as a whole.&nbsp; But the coverage seems to be disproportionate.&nbsp; A prime example is on the morning after Election day here, they had a report from Gaza and how the Palestinians were reacting to the election results.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Seriously?&nbsp; That's what's news worthy: How another country is reacting to our election?&nbsp; I'm far more interested in how WE are reacting to the election in our own country.</p>
<p>I don't imagine there was a whole lot of hand-wringing in Egypt about what we thought of their election.&nbsp; Nor France.&nbsp; Or Greece.&nbsp; Or Russia.</p>
<p>I listen to NPR to have a more well-rounded world view.&nbsp; I guess my complain is that the domination of the Middle Eastern news is blocking out all the rest of the news that deserves coverage too.</p>
<p>Europe needs more coverage.&nbsp; They are our biggest trading partner and are going through a major crisis.&nbsp; China is hugely important to the U.S.&nbsp; More coverage is needed about them.&nbsp;&nbsp; Mexico is increasingly an important trading partner and little is ever discussed about them.&nbsp; How about South America?&nbsp; Harly know they even exist based on the news coverage....</p>
<p>And it isn't just NPR.&nbsp; All the major news outlets seem focused almost solely on the U.S, and the Middle East...the rest of the world be damnned!</p>
<p>This is a very disturbing trend and one I hope changes soon.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashreboot.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-31532241.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>